Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 117(6): 643-650, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2204959

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The aim of this study is to analyze the progress of hospitalizations and how the emergency operations in our Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of the Foggia Hospital have changed qualitatively and quantitatively from pre-Covid-19 to today. Methods: Our cohort-study was conducted by analyzing four groups of patients admitted in emergency to our department from 2019 to 2022. Results: We observed a total of 150 patients for the group 1, 25 patients for the group 2, 71 patients for the group 3 and 110 for the group 4, of these 20 were emergency admission during 2019, 16 during 2020, 31 during 2021 and 10 during 2020 (p 0.05); 130 were elective admission during 2019, 9 during 2020, 40 during 2021 and 100 during 2022 (p 0.05). Of the emergency admissions 11 were operated during the no covid period in 2019, 14 during 2020, 29 during 2021, 6 during 2022. Conclusions: The contraction of hospitalizations for urgent and emergency conditions during the first lockdown has been accompanied by positive implications. The measures employed in hospitals to contain the infection determined a reduction in COVID cases, allowing the nearly complete resumption of the surgical activity provided in the pre-COVID era.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Treatment Outcome , Emergency Service, Hospital
2.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 116(6): 725-736, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1650583

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The study is presenting a personal experience of a Trauma Centre Level I and is try to conclude on optimal medical attitude for patients with retroperitoneal hematoma, still a controversial topic for traumatologists. Material and Method: A retrospective analysis of 22 cases of post-traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma admitted on Bucharest Emergency Hospital between September 2018 August 2021 (including time of Covid-19 pandemic), is presented Results: The patients (males predominance, mean age 43, mean ISS of 23), benefited of nonoperative management on admission for 10 cases (45%) with a failure rate of 4/10 due to recurrent bleeding from spleen injuries and continuous bleeding from mesenteric vessels lesions. CT scan (73% - 16 cases) within 1 hour from the admission and emergency surgery were necessary for 12 cases (55%). 2 patients benefited of angioembolization on admission. Conservative attitude for retroperitoneal hematoma was adopted for 72% cases. Over-all mortality: 18% (4 patients, mean ISS of 36), among 82% polytrauma cases. Conclusions: Algorithm of treatment is adapted to every case of retroperitoneal hematoma but the following sequences are mandatory: rapid transportation to Trauma Centre Level I with medical help, correct resuscitation, immediate relevant imagistic (CT scan), emergency surgery prior to angioembolization (for hemodynamic instable patients) or after it, ICU stabilization of the patient and then definitive repair of the injuries. Despite all, mortality remains high.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries , COVID-19 , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Abdominal Injuries/complications , Abdominal Injuries/therapy , Adult , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage , Hematoma/diagnostic imaging , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/surgery , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
3.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 116(6): 748-755, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1596438

ABSTRACT

Background: In the case of patients admitted with acute abdomen at the emergency department, interstitial pulmonary pathology (Covid-19 infections) represents a significant operative risk for the patients. The rate of postoperative complications is high with increased morbidity and mortality, a real challenge for the medical staff and surgical/intensive care unit teams. In emergency settings, patients were examined with targeted clinical and paraclinical parameters that assure a fast diagnosis to optimize a rapid medical and surgical treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study that included patients enrolled and diagnosed with an acute surgical abdomen in Surgical Clinic 1 Tg. Mures Emergency County Hospital. Patients were examined and analyzed at the emergency department UPU-SMURD. We included patients admitted over the two years (2019 and 2020) and divided them into two groups. Results: The total number of patients admitted in the UPU-Smurd emergency department Surgical Clinic I over the two years was 1033. There was a significant reduction in total cases diagnosed with the acute surgical abdomen in the pandemic period (p=0.033). The average time from the admission to the surgical procedure was significantly higher in the pandemic period 380Ã+-2 min in comparison with 222+-3 min (p=0.001) and also with an increased average operative time 223+-3 min versus 145+-2 min (p=0.002). Average hospitalization time was higher in the pandemic period 10+-1 (p=0.031) with no significant difference between the groups regarding Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission (p=0.122). Overall mortality has more than doubled, with 31 cases (19%) in the pandemic and 28 (9%) in the non-pandemic. (p=0.001). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has played an essential role in treating acute surgical abdomen cases. The high solicitation rate of the emergency department delayed the diagnosis and treatment of severe surgical cases. As the scale of this pandemic is unprecedented, standard protocols with minor changes do not provide adequate results.


Subject(s)
Abdomen, Acute , COVID-19 , Abdomen , Abdomen, Acute/etiology , Abdomen, Acute/surgery , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL